Author: Kirsten Mason

This article appeared on CBC News on May 17th, 2011 and was written by Sunny Freeman.

Climbing home prices and tighter mortgage rules are closing doors to the real estate market for some new homebuyers, contributing to a near 15 per cent year-over-year decline last month in Canadian home sales.

The national average home price rose by eight per cent in April even as housing sales fell by 14.7 per cent from the year before, according to data released Tuesday by the Canadian Real Estate Association.

“Changes to mortgage regulations that took effect in April 2011 likely sidelined a number of first-time homebuyers,” said Gregory Klump, CREA’s chief economist.

Those changes, which actually took effect midway through March, cut the longest possible amortization period to 30 years from 35 years, an effort to curb high-risk borrowing. However, it also forced some potential buyers out of the market who couldn’t afford the higher monthly payments for the shorter period.

The new rules had already left a mark on existing home sales during the previous quarter as home sales surged to their highest level in a year as buyers rushed in to beat the tougher restrictions, said Leslie Preston, an economic analyst at TD Economics.

“We don’t expect the first quarter’s pace to be sustained (through the rest of the year) and April’s reading sets the stage for an expected softening,” she said.

Meanwhile, similar government moves last spring that made it harder to qualify for a mortgage, and that gave sales a boost last April that amplified the year-over-year decline even further.

“Last April, several transitory factors artificially boosted sales. This included the impending tightening of mortgage rules, speculation about higher interest rates and the looming introduction of the HST in some provinces,” said Klump.

He said that additional measures to tighten mortgage rules and other factors made it difficult to compare the latest results to a year earlier and reliably gauge the impact of the mortgage rule changes.

Further adding to pressure on buyers, the national average home prices rose by eight per cent to $372,544 compared to last April — the third consecutive month in which the national average price rose by eight per cent from year ago levels.

A boom in sales of multi-million dollar properties, largely in the Greater Vancouver area, has been skewing the average home price upward in recent months. Average home prices in British Columbia were up 16 per cent, double the national average — sending the country-wide average higher.

“Higher end home sales in Greater Vancouver and Toronto had their best April ever,” Klump said.

In Vancouver, average home prices were $879,039 last month. In Toronto, they were up to $477,407. Excluding Toronto and Vancouver, seasonally-adjusted prices dipped 0.5 per cent to $367,600, said BMO Capital Markets economist Robert Kavcic.

While demand for high-end properties fell in April compared to March, so did sales of lower-priced properties, helping to keep average home prices high.

The number of newly listed homes edged up 1.3 per cent in April from March, but remained well below levels in January and February, when the coming mortgage rule changes were announced.

“New listings are down a hefty 15 per cent year-over-year, one big reason why prices remain lofty despite moderating sales activity. This is especially true in pricier markets like Toronto (-29.9 per cent year-over-year) and Vancouver (-23.4 per cent year-over-year),” Kavcic said.

The total number of homes sold on CREA’s Multiple Listing Service in April fell to 16,525 from 17,937 a year ago. On a seasonally adjusted basis, sales were down 4.4. per cent from March of this year.

Declines were largest in some of Canada’s most expensive and active markets, including Toronto, Vancouver and British Columbia’s Fraser Valley. Still, sales activity in April was up from last year in a number of local markets, the association said.

Year-over-year comparisons should become less pronounced in the coming months, as last year sales dipped 17 per cent in May and June, Kavcic said.

“Canada’s housing market appears well balanced overall, with the ratio of sales to new listings bang on its long-run average, though some local markets are clearly hotter than others,” he said.

“Higher mortgage rates and now stricter mortgage rules should keep sales and prices well behaved in the year ahead.”

CREA said that the increases in newly-listed homes combined with fewer sales in April helped push more than two-thirds of local markets considered balanced.

The national sales-to-new listings ratio, a measure of market balance, stood at 52.5 per cent in April, down from 55.7 in March.

The number of months it would take to sell all of the listings on the MLS, another measure of supply and demand, was up to six months in April, up from 5.7 months in March.

Housing starts — another key indicator of demand for homes — were slower than expected in April, largely due to a decline in construction on multi-unit buildings such as apartments and condos. That was much weaker than economists had been expecting, as construction activity usually picks up in the spring.

A drop in housing starts and sales of previously occupied homes had been widely anticipated. However, the expected drop in home sales across Canada this year will be less than previously forecast because of stronger sales of mega-homes in British Columbia in the first quarter, the Canadian Real Estate Association said earlier this month.

CREA now expects that unit sales for 2011 will dip 1.3 per cent to 441,100, less than the 1.6 per cent decline it forecast in February.

National sales activity of homes sold on CREA’s Multiple Listing Services should rebound by 2.6 per cent to 452,000 units in 2012, it added. That’s in line with the previous forecast and the 10-year average for annual activity.

The national average home price is forecast to rise four per cent in 2011 to $352,500 and by 0.9 per cent to $355,800 in 2012. If that prediction is to hold true, prices will have to fall nearly six per cent in coming months from the $372,544 average price reported in April.

Link

This article came from Royal LePage Canada and was published on May 20th, 2011.

Bullish attitude toward recreational properties reflects recent strength of housing market, according to Royal LePage.

TORONTO, May 20, 2011 – An overwhelming majority of Canadians who have either purchased or who intend to buy recreational property in the next 24 months believe that buying a vacation home is a good long-term investment, according to a nationwide survey of Canadian attitudes towards recreational property ownership commissioned by Royal LePage Real Estate Services and run on the Angus Reid Forum.

Overall, the survey found that 89 per cent of current owners and prospective buyers agree that recreational properties are a good long-term investment. Broken down by region, this included 92 per cent of respondents from Alberta, 91 per cent of Ontarians, 87 per cent of BC residents and 81 per cent of people surveyed in Quebec.

When respondents were asked to compare recreational properties to the stock market in terms of providing a larger financial return on investment, 50 per cent said recreational properties provided a larger return. Only 29 per cent replied investing in the stock market, while 21 per cent were undecided.

“Canadians’ confidence in recreational property values is mirroring what we have been seeing in Canada’s urban centres,” said Phil Soper, president and chief executive, Royal LePage Real Estate Services. “This spring, the horror stories from some fundamentally flawed international housing markets that had dampened demand for cottage-type living during the recession era, are being shrugged off.  Canada’s traditionally buoyant recreational property market appears to have found its groove once more.”

Interestingly, a majority of respondents (57 per cent) said that the expectation of interest rates rising will not affect their desire to purchase a recreational property. Among this group, 55 per cent of respondents aged 35-54 (and 70 per cent of respondents aged 55+) said an expected rise in interest rates would not affect their desire to purchase a recreational property.

When it came to financial and lifestyle sacrifices to purchase a recreational property, more than a third polled (35 per cent) responded that they were most likely to reduce personal spending throughout the year. The two least favoured strategies were to drive as far as necessary and to make the recreational property a primary residence, both 13 per cent.

“Relentlessly wet and miserable weather has delayed the 2011 buying season in some regions of the country.  But while weather delays intent, it doesn’t change it. The Royal LePage Recreational Property Report shows that the steadily improving economy has stoked consumer confidence which should impact demand positively. We expect to see considerable activity in the coming months – especially in higher-end and luxury segments,” added Soper.

More than half (51 per cent) of those polled said they are, or will be, renting out their property to offset their mortgage and other associated costs. However, many of those willing to rent plan to be selective (32 per cent) and only rent their recreational property to someone who have been referred by someone they knew.

“We are seeing more buyers purchase properties with the intent to offer them as rentals. This cost-offset strategy may allow younger families to acquire a cottage earlier in their lives than they would otherwise, and others may be able to buy in a region that would have been out of their reach, price-wise. The purchase motivation for most is not financial planning. It remains lifestyle driven – satisfying the needs and wants of their family,” said Soper. “In fact, 92 per cent of those we polled agreed that a recreational property is a great way to bring family together.”

The survey was commissioned as part of the 2011 Royal LePage Recreational Property Report, an annual market analysis of recreational property prices, trends and activity in selected leisure markets across the country.

The chart below shows the typical price range for standard waterfront, land-access properties across Canada in 2011.
Selected regional findings: (to view all regions click here)

British Columbia

According to respondents from BC, the most important features of a recreational property are four-season use and quiet (tied at 43 per cent) and proximity to amenities and rental potential (tied at 31 per cent).

Eighty-five per cent of respondents from BC either somewhat agree or strongly agree that a recreational property is a great way to bring family together (seven per cent below the national average of 92 per cent and lowest in the country).

Link